Reference
Romero IL, McCormick A, McEwen KA, et al. Relationship of type II diabetes and metformin use to ovarian cancer progression, survival, and chemosensitivity. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(1):61-67.
Â
Design
Single institution retrospective cohort chart review
Â
Participants
The study compared survival times among 341 epithelial ovarian cancer patients, of whom 297 were non-diabetic, 28 were type II diabetics who did not use metformin, and 16 were type II diabetics who used metformin.Â
Â
Intervention
Type II diabetes diagnosis and metformin usage were compared with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and chemotherapy resistance rate. Subgroups had similar grade and stage and received similar surgical and chemotherapy treatment.
Â
Outcome Measures
Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios were calculated for the relationship between PFS, OS, and metformin usage.
Â
Key Findings
The 5-year PFS was 51% for diabetics using metformin, 23% for non-diabetics, and 8% for diabetics not using metformin (P=0.03). The 5-year OS was 63% for the diabetics taking metformin, 37% for non-diabetics, and 23% for diabetics not taking metformin (P=0.03).
Â
Practice Implications
In this study Romero et al report that metformin use was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival in ovarian cancer patients receiving standard treatments. In fact, over an 18-year period, the survival rate among the metformin group was so elevated that it was not possible to estimate the upper confidence interval for PFS and OS. In contrast, the typical median survival time after completion of first-line chemotherapy is just 15 months.1
Â
The possibility that a common, inexpensive, and relatively safe drug might have a profound impact on cancer survival has taken root in recent months. ClinicalTrials.gov currently lists 20 studies on 'metformin and cancer.' The association of metformin usage with improved cancer survival may be surprising at first, given that diabetics have additional comorbidities and a higher overall risk of cancer mortality. However, the results are not unexpected when metformin’s multiple antineoplastic mechanisms of action are considered.
Â
Metformin users in the Romero study also trended toward greater chemosensitivity to platinum, a first-line chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. Preclinical data indicate that metformin may chemosensitize ovarian cancer cells to platinum therapy. Metformin generates a mild and transient inhibition of the mTOR pathway, suggesting that ongoing therapy would be needed for best effects.2 Dosage ranges in the cancer clinical trials are 500 to 1,500 mg daily.
Â
Several cohort studies have found an association between metformin use and decreased cancer incidence in general. Romero’s findings are consistent with those of the Dutch ZODIAC trial that found a 57% decrease in cancer mortality for diabetics taking metformin. ZODIAC also found a dose-dependent relationship, with a 42% decrease in cancer mortality for each 1-gram/day increase in dose.3 A large case-control study found that long-term metformin use was associated with a decreased risk of ovarian cancer, while long-term insulin use increased risk. Sulfonylurea use did not affect cancer risk.4 It is unclear what proportion of the results are due to direct drug effects or to overall glycemic control, as insulin-dependence is a marker of disease progression in type II diabetics. A 2011 Dutch study of 11,140 diabetics that prescribed intensive pharmaceutical glycemic control with insulin, sulfonylurea, and metformin did not find that this approach lowered cancer incidence.5 In March 2012, a Taiwanese study, looking at 1 million participants, reported that the use of hypoglycemic medications was associated with a 40% decreased risk of lung cancer. The study did not distinguish between types of hypoglycemic agents.6
Â
Japanese researchers are assessing the use of metformin for colorectal cancer prevention, investigating whether use will prevent progression of dysplastic aberrant crypt foci (ACF). In a randomized pilot study of 26 nondiabetic patients with biopsy-proven ACF, metformin 250 mg daily for 1 month significantly decreased the number of ACF and the cellular proliferation index.7 This study provides biopsy evidence of chemopreventive activity. Earlier animal studies by the same researchers had found that metformin decreases ACF.8
Â
While both hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia promote tumor growth and are predictive of decreased ovarian cancer survival, there are also other mechanisms at work.9,10  Metformin acts on several antiproliferative pathways. While clinical trials obviously show that metformin increases insulin sensitivity, biopsies taken during cancer trials reveal that metformin decreases cancer cell proliferation (measured via Ki67 and cellular proliferation index), induces apoptosis (measured via p53), and decreases expression of BRCA-1.11–13
Â
In vitro and animal research indicates that metformin potentiates cisplatin, induces apoptosis (via decreased BCL-2 and BCL-XL, increased BAX and BAD, and activated caspases 3 and 7), decreases inflammation (via Il-6), decreases cell proliferation (via Ki67 and cyclin D1), decreases tumor cell adhesion, and decreases angiogenesis (via VEGF, mTOR, and microvessel density).14–21
Â
The mTOR and AMP-activated protein kinase  (AMPK) pathways are particularly relevant to metformin and cancer. Angiogenesis and cellular energy are regulated by mTOR and AMPK. Metformin decreases hepatic gluconeogenesis in diabetics via the AMPK pathway, which also regulates cell energy.22 When metformin increases AMPK and decreases mTOR, it also slows tumor metabolism.  Protein translation and cell proliferation are also regulated by mTOR.23
Â
A phase 1 trial of the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus paired with metformin produced a response in 6 out of 11 patients with treatment refractory solid tumors.
Â
Â
A phase 1 trial of the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus paired with metformin produced a response in 6 out of 11 patients with treatment refractory solid tumors.24
Â
Metformin’s mTOR inhibition sensitizes ovarian tumor cells and targets stem cells to radiation in vitro.25 Furthermore, metformin-induced AMPK blocks the tendency for elevated luteinizing hormone, a risk factor for ovarian cancer to promote angiogenesis.26
Â
It should be mentioned that berberine both in vitro and in vivo activates many of the same antiproliferative pathways that metformin does, though this is not yet confirmed in clinical trials.27–31
Â
This current study by Romero et al suggests that metformin provides diabetic women with ovarian cancer a benefit so compelling that we should be hard pressed to find a reason for them not to take metformin. Related studies in breast cancer and colorectal dysplasia suggest that metformin may also have antineoplastic benefits in non-diabetics. While prospective trials are certainly needed to clarify therapeutic effectiveness, given metformin’s relative safety, off-label usage of this medication in ovarian cancer patients is gaining in popularity.
Â
For more research involving integrative oncology, click here.